Boycotts don't hurt Chansiri... - Sheffield Wednesday Matchday - Owlstalk | Sheffield Wednesday News for SWFC fans Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, DJMortimer said:

The constant price hikes, threats to withdraw funding, multiple references to 'cashflow issues', front-loaded finance schemes, complaints about 'bad customers', repeated late payments and all that other stuff show clearly, whatever he might publicly say, that the decreasing investment is a serious problem to him. It might take a while, but the walls are closing in.

The rascal should sell his mansion and be a good customer........to his creditor. 

  • Haha 7
Posted

 

The strongest action isn't always immediately visible or immediate. EVERYBODY knows the "hit them in the pocket" mantra eventually works. It takes time though. Look at Brewdog. Might have taken a few years but customers have voted with their wallets and they are on their ar5e. 

  • Like 4
Posted
1 minute ago, UTO210491 said:

Can you tag those who have said this? Or is just one of those ‘posts’ for the sake of making a point?

 

attendance boycotts would aid the cause if executed correctly over a period of

time. But unless there is 100% POTD walk out, every single game and next to no season ticket renewals, then unfortunately they are hardly impactful. 

Can you explain your reasoning around that? Why does it have to be 100 boycott by POTD%?? Why does it have to be 'next to no season ticket sales?'

  • Like 1
  • Agree 3

"capitalism doesn't breed innovation" - duncanidaho off of Owlstalk

Posted (edited)

Either:-

 

A) He's decided not to invest any more money and therefore if he give him money, he might be able to carry on as chairman. Whereas if we don't give him money, he has to fund it himself which will force him to sell. 

 

Or B) He hasn't got the money left and if we continue to give him money, he might be able to cling on. However, if we defund him, it's administration/winding up order and he has to sell. 

 

So both options lead to him selling eventually, IF we don't fund him. 

 

So anyone who says it makes no difference is an idiot, a Chansiri bot, or both. 

Edited by Howmanyowls
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Agree 6
Posted
6 minutes ago, UTO210491 said:

Can you tag those who have said this? Or is just one of those ‘posts’ for the sake of making a point?

 

attendance boycotts would aid the cause if executed correctly over a period of

time. But unless there is 100% POTD walk out, every single game and next to no season ticket renewals, then unfortunately they are hardly impactful. 
 

 

 

 

 

So I suppose after RMS Titanic hit the iceberg it must have sunk immediately then? If not, the collision must have been 'hardly impactful'? 🤔

 

  • Like 4
  • Love 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Nannan said:

Can you explain your reasoning around that? Why does it have to be 100 boycott by POTD%?? Why does it have to be 'next to no season ticket sales?'


season tickets revenue has already been realised and cash has left for this year so giving up c£6-8m of revenue from most saying no will help.

so then we only have matchdays. Average POTD last year was around 3/4? say an average ticket price of £25/30? 
 

so revenue game by game on ticket sales now is next to fizz all thats why it needs to be done properly otherwise, meh.

  • Haha 4

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Forum Statistics

    187.5k
    Total Topics
    7.9m
    Total Posts
×
×
  • Create New...