Popular Post Nannan Posted August 27, 2025 Popular Post Posted August 27, 2025 I STILL see people saying this. i just don't understand how people can't see how they DO hurt him, and hurt a lot. Sheffield Wednesday is HIS investment. If Sheffield Wednesday go into admin - hes lost his investment. EVERY £1 paid by a fan into the club account is a £1 he doesnt have to find. Every £1 short is a £1 he has to make up. OR - the club will go into administration as it wouldn't break even.. And then hes lost his investment, and we would be sold to a new investor for a nominal sum of money. It really is THAT Simple. 11 7 4 95 "capitalism doesn't breed innovation" - duncanidaho off of Owlstalk
Popular Post Miffed Posted August 27, 2025 Popular Post Posted August 27, 2025 He can turn a blind eye to shouting and banner waving. 2 1 10
Popular Post Nannan Posted August 27, 2025 Author Popular Post Posted August 27, 2025 2 minutes ago, Miffed said: He can turn a blind eye to shouting and banner waving. He doesnt have to from Bangkok Shouting Chansiris a c**t to an empty seat in the Directors Box makes not an iota of difference to him 4 2 9 "capitalism doesn't breed innovation" - duncanidaho off of Owlstalk
Popular Post DJMortimer Posted August 27, 2025 Popular Post Posted August 27, 2025 The constant price hikes, threats to withdraw funding, multiple references to 'cashflow issues', front-loaded finance schemes, complaints about 'bad customers', repeated late payments and all that other stuff show clearly, whatever he might publicly say, that the decreasing investment is a serious problem to him. It might take a while, but the walls are closing in. 7 4 38
mozzy85 Posted August 27, 2025 Posted August 27, 2025 1 minute ago, DJMortimer said: The constant price hikes, threats to withdraw funding, multiple references to 'cashflow issues', front-loaded finance schemes, complaints about 'bad customers', repeated late payments and all that other stuff show clearly, whatever he might publicly say, that the decreasing investment is a serious problem to him. It might take a while, but the walls are closing in. The rascal should sell his mansion and be a good customer........to his creditor. 7
Popular Post oh_weds_we_love_you Posted August 27, 2025 Popular Post Posted August 27, 2025 Ch*nsiri can't even afford to employ coaches unless they agree to a 50% wage reduction on relegation apparently. Starving him of money via boycotts is the ONLY way to get rid of him. 6 12
Popular Post swfcGibbo Posted August 27, 2025 Popular Post Posted August 27, 2025 Yep. Exactly. Not only this, but the media scrutiny and exposure of his shortcomings are further exacerbated by fan protests and walkouts. He's getting crucified, and he and his family will be hating it. 5 3 12
Popular Post Nannan Posted August 27, 2025 Author Popular Post Posted August 27, 2025 4 minutes ago, DJMortimer said: The constant price hikes, threats to withdraw funding, multiple references to 'cashflow issues', front-loaded finance schemes, complaints about 'bad customers', repeated late payments and all that other stuff show clearly, whatever he might publicly say, that the decreasing investment is a serious problem to him. It might take a while, but the walls are closing in. It will take longer while people still contribute cash to him. 7 10 "capitalism doesn't breed innovation" - duncanidaho off of Owlstalk
Popular Post UTO210491 Posted August 27, 2025 Popular Post Posted August 27, 2025 Can you tag those who have said this? Or is just one of those ‘posts’ for the sake of making a point? attendance boycotts would aid the cause if executed correctly over a period of time. But unless there is 100% POTD walk out, every single game and next to no season ticket renewals, then unfortunately they are hardly impactful. 1 11
gtownowl Posted August 27, 2025 Posted August 27, 2025 The strongest action isn't always immediately visible or immediate. EVERYBODY knows the "hit them in the pocket" mantra eventually works. It takes time though. Look at Brewdog. Might have taken a few years but customers have voted with their wallets and they are on their ar5e. 4
Popular Post SHUowl Posted August 27, 2025 Popular Post Posted August 27, 2025 1 minute ago, UTO210491 said: Can you tag those who have said this? Or is just one of those ‘posts’ for the sake of making a point? attendance boycotts would aid the cause if executed correctly over a period of time. But unless there is 100% POTD walk out, every single game and next to no season ticket renewals, then unfortunately they are hardly impactful. So to summarise, you want them to trawl through and pull out all of the posters in the threads where they've said it. Then you want them to do some basic maths for you about how much ticket revenue and secondary spend the club is losing through lower attendance. I'm guessing if they don't, you think it proves your point? 5 3 1 3
Nannan Posted August 27, 2025 Author Posted August 27, 2025 1 minute ago, UTO210491 said: Can you tag those who have said this? Or is just one of those ‘posts’ for the sake of making a point? attendance boycotts would aid the cause if executed correctly over a period of time. But unless there is 100% POTD walk out, every single game and next to no season ticket renewals, then unfortunately they are hardly impactful. Can you explain your reasoning around that? Why does it have to be 100 boycott by POTD%?? Why does it have to be 'next to no season ticket sales?' 1 3 "capitalism doesn't breed innovation" - duncanidaho off of Owlstalk
Howmanyowls Posted August 27, 2025 Posted August 27, 2025 (edited) Either:- A) He's decided not to invest any more money and therefore if he give him money, he might be able to carry on as chairman. Whereas if we don't give him money, he has to fund it himself which will force him to sell. Or B) He hasn't got the money left and if we continue to give him money, he might be able to cling on. However, if we defund him, it's administration/winding up order and he has to sell. So both options lead to him selling eventually, IF we don't fund him. So anyone who says it makes no difference is an idiot, a Chansiri bot, or both. Edited August 27, 2025 by Howmanyowls 1 1 6
DJMortimer Posted August 27, 2025 Posted August 27, 2025 6 minutes ago, UTO210491 said: Can you tag those who have said this? Or is just one of those ‘posts’ for the sake of making a point? attendance boycotts would aid the cause if executed correctly over a period of time. But unless there is 100% POTD walk out, every single game and next to no season ticket renewals, then unfortunately they are hardly impactful. So I suppose after RMS Titanic hit the iceberg it must have sunk immediately then? If not, the collision must have been 'hardly impactful'? 4 2 1
UTO210491 Posted August 27, 2025 Posted August 27, 2025 4 minutes ago, Nannan said: Can you explain your reasoning around that? Why does it have to be 100 boycott by POTD%?? Why does it have to be 'next to no season ticket sales?' season tickets revenue has already been realised and cash has left for this year so giving up c£6-8m of revenue from most saying no will help. so then we only have matchdays. Average POTD last year was around 3/4? say an average ticket price of £25/30? so revenue game by game on ticket sales now is next to fizz all thats why it needs to be done properly otherwise, meh. 4
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now