Rotherham Owl

If you type in the person's name, Neil has made it auto correct to "STOP MENTIONING THIS PERSON" The grey haired person is slagging off the Administrators and trying to make his own agenda. As usual what he is saying is Böllocks

Thank you Neil that made me laugh. For the record, I did not mention the C word.

"We’re fully aware of questions about individuals who may have spoken at previous Trust events. Aside from offering personal opinions at those events, no external individuals have any involvement in the Trust’s board, its decisions, or its work." From Trust's twitter account.

Go onto twitter, STOP MENTIONING THIS PERSON is still pretending he is important.

We are out of sight.

It isn't just the number of match attending supporters which they buying, it is all fans. It is also about the name, the history - what they can sell to the USA etc.

Think you need to look up the term 'dead rubber'. 2,400 of the 3,000 are coming because they could go in to the automatics with a win or move out of the playoffs with a loss.

Why would new owners waste money on this season. Better to save it for next season. Players are always more expensive in January, but that doesn't matter to us as we can't buy anyone anyway. Contracts run until the end of the season so there won't be any frees available either. We have what we have got now until the end of the season. Only chance we have is if some Premier League clubs see what we have done with Amass and give us a few future stars to develop for them.

Lady on the front row holding the white flowers is there on behalf of her son. He has navy experience and said HMS ******** the league is setting sail - guaranteed, no sweet. He is backed by a US Financia who prefers the youth and is prepared to give them a good go and will even encourage them to go out on loan.

Only for those that can't handle their drink.

But still half the length of the pub up the road in S5.

No need for that.

The £80 is the reward, you get to pay the same price (per game) as a season ticket holder who bought one and didn't boycott. The additional £20 is a reward to all those that paid £50 membership when the club needed the money the most.

Can I have your job, being paid to be on Owlstalk.

You used to live in the Stadium?

I used to bring in 2 of my kids for £23 a season and another 2 of them for £75. I still could if they didn't get older. This year I paid £345 for 2 of them and £75 for the other 3. It isn't just about price, I don't know what it is. I was going to say it is getting dads, mums, uncles and aunties to take a child but then I remember me going as a child I used to go with my mates. I doubt a bunch of twelve year olds are allowed in the ground now without an adult. I don't know the answer it is above me ken, hopefully the new owner can get the balance right.

Wouldnt have expected you to have. Well done for everything you are doing.

Sponsoring a player the Vatman takes 16.67%, the club gets 100% if it is a donation.

It is fücking stupid. It is outdated and to stop what Ken Bates did at Leeds happening again. Football ownership has moved on the rules haven't far better to get a rogue owner in to administration and gone. No points deduction would preserve the value of the club and therefore encourage the bad owner to exit.

Not as unlikely as you think. Business man who is a Wednesday fan from Donny is definitely interested.

iplayer is available in Ireland.

Over 600 tickets sold in last 30 minutes.

The one on the ground was due at the end of last month and the lender has a right of sale 7 days after. Chansiri might still be negotiating or it may have been paid off by rolling it on for another year.

HMRC don't appoint administrators. They don't care about SWFC nor do they care that we have 2 home games in 3 days.

HMRC, like any other creditor can go to court to wind a company up for non payment of monies. HMRC are more likely to do this as they have a preferred creditor status in a winding up. There are no fixed or floating charges against SWFC listed. Employees claims are higher but limited as to the amount. As has been oft quoted on here, an unsecured creditor can go to court to get an administrator appointed instead of a liquidator, but this is very difficult and rare. There are three criteria that the court will consider: 1. The company is a going concern - without director/shareholder backing we are not. 2. It would achieve a better result for the creditors (this is cash not emotions) as a whole. Chansiri is still a big part of the creditors as a whole and also administration would not, if creditor led, result in a better result for the creditors. 3. To secure the assets for sale, the true assets are the fan base and the place in the EFL, I don't think an Administrator can sell either of them. In my opinion, the only way a court would even consider an unsecured creditor's application to appoint an Administrator would be if, the unsecured creditor has an investor behind them to say they will back and pay the losses going forward and give the creditors more money than they would otherwise get. A kind of creditor prepack. If Chansiri as the main creditor could challenge or not the "better result for the creditors". I presume he could and guess he might win. In Summary a HMRC winding up, would probably lead to the liquidation of SWFC. Unless. . . . . . The IFR steps in. This is my only hope. I have read the legislation and believe he as the powers, although from here I am not sure if he has the powers now. Hopefully they will be forthcoming. @kobayashi your thoughts on my summary would be appreciated, at least by me.