DNS

No, but a rebuild around Bannan is only a short-term plan. If the club wants to move forward it can't keep relying on Bannan at 36 y/o.

But disappears in big matches?

Well said. The self-righteousness of certain fans is getting very tiresome now. People telling others what to do based on future, hypothetical outcomes.

Have the trust ever called out fans buying away tickets, and asked for a travel boycott?

52 fans? Good one...

If this your same view for the 1000s who shouted, argued and committed to the pitch invasion on here/social media, before a handful actually went through it?

Brown's definitely adjusted to this level better than Cadz, but I'm not getting carried with him because as this post shows, most of our young lads show promise then quickly fade.

Definitely. I still think Rhodes was a good signing but we never played him the right way.

I liked Carlos but he underachieved. He built some of the best squads in Championship history and winning the league wasn't unrealistic.

Then went on to play for Everton and Fulham whilst we dropped down the leagues. Wednesdayites summed up.

Storm the pitch, you'll not force him to sell it. Idiots.

The answer is simple to me; whether you boycott games or not, it won't speed up or force through a sale.

The populous of Birmingham alone swamps South Yorkshire. Like I said in my first post, there's more to get out of Birmingham than Sheffield, regardless of how you perceive the historical size each club.

Being realistic isn't oldie-worldy. A club in a city with a large catchment area has more to invest in a potential fanbase, and we're surrounded by towns with their own clubs. A successful club needs an growing, prosperous city to bounce off, which Sheffield simply isn't anymore.

Ahh, the old ignorant, naivety of Wednesdayites. Birmingham dwarfs Sheffield as a geographical catchment area. There's a reason Brady invested in that club.