Triple O - Owlstalk | Sheffield Wednesday News for SWFC fans Jump to content

Triple O

Owlstalk Subscriber
  • Posts

    3,157
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Location
    Miles away

Recent Profile Visitors

26,282 profile views

Triple O's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Dedicated
  • Very Popular
  • Posting Machine
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

2.2k

Reputation

  1. Don't think he wanted to be there but someone had to plug The gaps
  2. What! Sunday United surrounded him which stopped him playmaking. He ran all over defensively
  3. Put this in another thread. Rumour that others will have seen. 3 new bids today and 2 more possible tomorrow
  4. Rumour again (but seems to get a lot right . Don't ask but others will have seen it as well) 3 new bids today and probably 2 more tomorrow.
  5. Hope the points deduction doesn't carry over if its still negative at season end.
  6. Going over old ground here but.... I don't know or believe if the Walton's have or haven't made a bid, or indeed intend to. How could I? Kris said that he wasn't aware of one which is very strange language to use when the word No would have sufficed. No confidence would have been breached as, if they weren't involved, no NDA would apply. The Admins have been very precise and clear in every other statement.
  7. Notice you don't quote what the administrator actually said.
  8. Cuddly bonkers or annoyingly bonkers?
  9. No not hinting at that. Just that due to NDAs they wouldn't know who is involved, therefore anyone not under NDA who they can verify as not involved there is no reason they couldn't explain how they categorically know that. Why can't they put flesh on the bones of a story We're all interested in?
  10. So do you categorically know WHO is involved?
  11. 2 more here https://www.owlstalk.co.uk/forums/topic/343773-norwich-game-lets-get-norwich-sold-out-now/page/106/#findComment-11896390
  12. Could you expand a little. If NAP didn't act to enforce their charge over the stadium and S3 (now in admin) own the stadium does that mean there is no reason to include it in SWFC administration figures. Then any buyer of the club could, in theory, buy the ground debt to NAP at 10% or less?
×
×
  • Create New...