wellbeaten-the-owl - Owlstalk | Sheffield Wednesday News for SWFC fans Jump to content

wellbeaten-the-owl

Member
  • Posts

    6,097
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

wellbeaten-the-owl last won the day on September 25

wellbeaten-the-owl had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

7,654 profile views

wellbeaten-the-owl's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (13/14)

  • Reacting Well
  • Very Popular
  • Dedicated
  • Posting Machine
  • Collaborator

Recent Badges

7.9k

Reputation

1

Community Answers

  1. It's obviously going to be. This could kill the club, there's a massive difference having a fee restriction for that period of time with a stacked academy and full squad, but with hardly any senior professional players and a couple of kids that'll likely leave soon anyway we're not a viable option for any serious buyer at any price
  2. Did you not read the bit about kicking us out of the league if we did that
  3. And then pointed out the 3 reasons why it wouldn't be removed, point is the outcome of that appeal has a huge impact on the value of the club and attractiveness to purchase. Like buying land without planning permission there's uncertainty that will put off buyers.
  4. Well might as well shut up shop because EFL have killed us with their stance in the fee restriction if new owner comes in. Nobody will buy us with that in place, who spend millions on a business you are banned from investing in the main part of for 2 years. It's an absolute disgrace, this lies at owners door not the fans that will suffer most in long term.
  5. Need to be realistic, won't be a full boycott. But if there's less than 8k in ground including away support then that's a success
  6. Will show what a farce the official "attendances" are when there is 6k in stadium but given as 22k
  7. Don't disagree but loved football and knew how to run a club and make a profit out of an industry that swallowed up others. Compared with current incumbent he was a hell of a good bloke and a terrific owner. RIP
  8. Those that went on did what they think was needed, personally think was unwise as risked personal consequence with no reward, but that's their choice and they can do what they want no issues with that . Do have issues with ones that there goading them to do it, saying that there was no risk because couldn't ban us all etc. If you want to make a difference stay away, don't enter ground, don't give him a penny home or away and starve him out.
  9. But going on pitch wasn't ever going to make that any more or less likely Club won't go Chansiri will.
  10. I also hope for world peace and to win lottery. You really think when it's cost club in Extra policing he won't go after those fans?
  11. Not worth the banning orders. Bad idea from start, online keyboard warriors pushing others to risk bans whilst they stay away boycotting. No person at the club will want to push for banning orders but the one that matters will
  12. Until he sues the fans that go on (don't believe for a minute he wouldn't)
  13. @Toadie has written a good piece in the star about the ramifications for the individuals/club. Not sure anyone would think he wouldn't take legal action if he had chance, yeah go on pitch for a pointless exercise, lose your jobs, home, and never be able to set foot in Hillsborough again afterwards, that'll show him!
  14. Wouldn't be shocked if there was policing in the ground tomorrow. Even if nobody gets in pitch at least It'll cost him more money with a big policing bill
×
×
  • Create New...